geosocial.net

The Map Room: Triangulations: March 27
# Jeff Thurston’s contribution to the debate over free geodata looks at the question of scale: if you want geospatial data to be free and updated regularly, consider the huge amount of territory that has to be mapped.
# Wired’s piece, Map Mashups Get Personal, looks at Platial, a service that […]

Architecture: Accustudio
Accustudio
The worldwide AccuRender resources supporting autocad, revit, rhino and all sorts of programs for its’ mapping and image library!
“What would a marketplace be without giveaways? Here you will find a number of items free for the taking. Download as much as you like, and if you know of a good freebie that you don’t […]

Plantizen — the planning & development network — made a list of its top 10 planning issues for 2005. Here’s what I think about them:

1. Kelo v. New London and Eminent Domain
Terrible, as I noted previously. Eminent Domain hurts the little guy 9 times out of 10. Its purpose is to facilitate land assembly for large-scale developers (non- and for-profit). The premise is that wholesale change is better than smaller, incremental change. The history of mega-development — even in the name of the public good — has been dreadful.

2. Hurricane Katrina
An important planning issue that has everyone in planning scrambling to get down to New Orleans to help. Perhaps I am cynical but where the hell were the social justice advocates before the hurricane? That it took a massive crisis to mobilize the planning profession seems to me to run counter to what planning is. Isn’t planning supposed to pro-active, not reactive? It should serve as a reminder to everyone of the importance of planning — that is, thinking into the future to head off potential disasters. Unfortunately, given the scale of disaster, those groups with a ready-made toolkit just waiting to be implemented will be the winners. And make no mistake — it is the New Urbanists who came to New Orleans ready to deploy. Somehow that troubles me…

3. America’s Failing Infrastructure
Nothing new here. As local budgets get squeezed further and further, the regular investments necessary to maintain infrastructure are not made — everything from bridges, roads, hospitals, schools, you name it. That’s one of the things government is supposed to do — figure out ways to make regular investments in critical public assets (either by direct support or user-pay). Donors don’t give money to fix potholes, so the problem usually isn’t with new ribbon-cutting initiatives, but rather with the everyday maintainence.

4. The McMansion Backlash
Well, there’s a backlash in certain circles, but to your average hard-working family, it is a symbol of pride and achievement to finally move into one of those hideously designed mega-houses in the suburbs. Certainly, it’s not my goal. But, until we find a way to even out land values across a metropolitan region, people will always be trading off location for space. It’s a values question — how much space do you really need? To me, I find it difficult to imagine a family of four requiring more than about 2,000 square feet + garage. Do the math: living room (250 s.f.), dining room (200 s.f.), kitchen (200 s.f.), den/family room (250 s.f.), master bedroom (200 s.f.), master bath (120 s.f.), walk-in-closet (60 s.f.), bedroom 2 (180 s.f.), bedroom 3 (180 s.f.), bath 2 (120 s.f.), laundry (60 s.f.), entry/powder (80 s.f. ), circulation (100 s.f.) = 2,000 s.f.

5. “Condofication”
Here, we are referring to the conversion of rental units into condos, often forcing people to relocate. To me, converting to condo ownership from rental isn’t the problem. The problem is when there aren’t enough condos on the market and prices are therefore exorbitant. We need to find a way to facilitate the construction of more housing units, rental and condo, period. Affordability problems are typically a problem of cities blocking what the market would otherwise be happy to provide. This is a morals question — current zoning prioritizes R1 (single family) above all else. Too much city land is zoned R1 and not multi-family. More multi-family housing (rental or condo) and the overall cost goes down.

6. Google Democratizes Mapping
I must say I love Google maps and Google Earth. The applications are vast. The Toronto Star, for example, uses Google to map the locations of homocides in the city, with pop-ups about each of the victims and, if known, the circumstances of their death. This is a powerful tool, and an honorable way of recognizing, in this case, the lives lost. Environmental groups can also use it to plot the location of the most polluting sites. There are thousands of applications - Google should be applauded for making this tool available to the public.

7. Wi-Fi Networks and Economic Development
This one bugs me. Sure, I would like to have wi-fi everywhere I go. But, it’s hardly a public good. Of all the basic things that governments still aren’t going well — like providing good schools, encouraging affordable housing, providing public security, etc — they feel it is important to spend millions on setting up a wireless network across the city (or downtown core). What a waste of taxpayer money. There are plenty of private companies that are all too willing to provide such a service for those of use lucky enough to have wireless devices. The fact is, this benefits only a small segment of the population. Government action should be to provide services that benefit the most number of people — things that are neither practical nor affordable if done privately. When we’ve created a more just society, then we can start worrying about making our toys work better.

8. The New Suburbanism and Creative Class Debates
This one boils down to the age-old battle of downtown vs. suburbs. But the debate is actually quite dumb. Richard Florida’s Creative Class is provocative and there is something to the idea that young professionals want to live in funky places. Likewise, one cannot debate the importance of suburbs in urban politics, as Joel Kotkin suggests. But, this isn’t a polar argument. The fact is, suburbs by necessity will be more dense (starting from the inner ring out). Urban areas will also by necessity become more dense. The issue isn’t suburbs vs. downtown, it’s the conflicts in both places over the need for higher density environments.

9. “Peak Oil” and Planning For Alternative Energy
This is also a debate for the ages. There’s no doubt that the cost of oil has entered into a new era — the days of $25/barrel are over for the foreseeable future. However, the forecasts that I have seen show the price of oil dropping over the coming years — still above $50, but not rising. At these price levels, areas like Alberta’s oil sands become feasible to develop. Which, in turn, will likely cause the price of oil to drop. So, yes, sustainability is vital — and we should be working towards that goal regardless, but until the Saudis issue a press release saying, “sorry we’re empty”, it is very likely that oil will continue to dominate. Cities (nations, even) would be smart, however, to think of the big picture, though. More sustainable environments is not just about a potential oil crisis. It’s about pollution and smog. It’s about wasted productivity (to this point, we’ve been lucky to have land to expand so that commute times remain the same, but the scarcity of land is quickly becoming a problem). It’s about the destruction of local food supply. It’s about parents not being home for their kids. It’s about kids playing video games and getting fat. It’s about a lot of things. We shouldn’t be fooled to think that the only reason why we should be more sustainable cities is because of oil.

10. The High Cost of Free Parking
Don Shoup is bang-on. Los Angeles is the worst offender. In Boston, parking is so scarce, it becomes very expensive. So, if given the choice between driving downtown and taking the T (subway), you take the T. A couple hours parking in downtown Boston can cost you $15-20. The equivalent in L.A. costs $2-5. Most places give two hours of free parking. Hell, even valet parking — something reserved for the uber-wealthy in Boston — is only a couple bucks more in Los Angeles. So, of course people drive in Los Angeles. The fact is, we have been subsidizing car use for decades. It is time that parking and those that drive pay its true cost. That means more expensive parking and freeway tools. You use it, you pay for it.

Population Action International, a group concerned about global overpopulation, is releasing a poster-sized world map that projects changes in world population density through 2025. Though the official release date is this Saturday, the map is available for download as a PDF file. The map is only a forecast, but it shows some interesting regional variations: very high population growth along the Ganges; depopulation in eastern Europe, Russia and Japan.

Categories: Demography | Comment on this entry

Tom Carden has put together a couple of interactive maps of the London Underground system as a proof of concept to visualize distance by the time of travel.

Shortest paths are used to place the other stations - radius is proportional to time to travel, and angle should be correct for as-the-crow-flies direction on a map. The concentric circles are at 10 minute intervals.

Related to Carte de l’Accessibilité des Communes Suisses, Non-geographic Mapping and Personal World Map.

Relation to my thesis: Finding examples to visualize mobility data as time to travel, cost to travel, pain to travel, …

Listen up, kids. Your life just got a little worse. A new service from Sprint Nextel allows parents to pinpoint your location on their cellphones or on the computer. There is even a feature that will send the parents a text message when you arrive at a specific destination. This service is available for $9.99 a month for up to four handsets.

Sprint Family Locator, new LBS service [MobileTracker]

 
Comment on this post

Related: HELIO and Yahoo! Announce Mobile Services Partnership
Related: Consumerist’s Mom Rips U.S. Pay-As-You-Go Services A New One

Rainbow coloured candy Skittles has just launched an innovative marketing campaign, a location based mobile contest. [via Alfie’s Blog]

Reading Everyware and thinking about Bruce Sterling’s talk at LIFT06 and ETECH, I was mumbling about the idea of googling objects to know where they are. What Bruce was saying:

“I have an Internet-of-Things with a search engine of things. So I no longer hunt anxiously for my missing shoes in the morning. I just Google them. As long as machines can crunch the complexities, their interfaces make my relationship to objects feel much simpler and more immediate. I am at ease in materiality in a way that people never were before.”

What I am interested in is how such a system tells the PROPER “locative assertion” (that is to say the name of the referred place). In the example above, my shoes can be “under my bed”, “on the third shelves under a pile of old rubbishes in my parent’s garage” and sometimes the scale is a lot bigger if you want the system to tell you that you threw your car keys in the pacific ocean.

From my perspective the challenge is to give “the users” a relevant indication of the whereabouts: sometimes it’s the name of a room, sometimes it’s geographical coordinates…

Of course, there is an interesting roundup/special case, especially when it comes to objects as described in ““Where Are the Christmas Decorations?”: A Memory Assistant for Storage Locations” by Lewis Creary, Michael VanHilst from HP Labs. The paper describes a storage location memory assistant that saves and retrieves information about the locations of stored objects in and around the user’s house. Something that would do:

User: Where are the Christmas decorations?
PDA: They’re in the leftmost medium-sized white box under the wood table in the garage.

But of course, you would have to tell the system where the object is, which is not that convenient, especially when you LOOSE TRACK of things.

Although not local, and mostly beyond the comprehension of any PIPS agent, this Crystalpunk stuff, created by the infamous Social Fiction group/person is quite interesting:

Public Space With a Roof invites you to join

A Crystalpunk Workshop for the Chain-Reaction Glitterati

Thursday, 20 April 2006,
between  7 - 11 p.m.

PSWAR [Public Space With A Roof] 7 -11 p.m.
Overtoom 301,1054 HW Amsterdam

Crystalpunk is a rally cry for people to come together and start making
all sorts of weird things, things slightly of kilter that need a
crystalpunk to have its delights appreciated, things that are radical
but hurt nobody.

Other people, “professionals”, are making things too. In art, in
architecture, in computer science, in biology, crystalpunks want to
share in their excitement, often feeling it more than they do, but
understanding it through reverie not formalism.

At socialfiction.org we have been thinking about gargoyle computation
[rococo automated search & gargoylisation not optimisation], software
as a crystal ball [cellular automata as discrete little worlds that
hide complex operations creating a universe to be discovered by its
users], pattern formation [put your fingers on your closed eyelids &
press gently], non conventional computing [molecule based & sea based],
unintentional intelligence [the wildtype adaptivism of
BacterioPoetics]. Somewhere in the middle we started writing a
chain-reaction automaton: on the GUI a Grid, inside it rectangles are
activated to rotate one step, activating others to rotate one step of 4
on close contact. The crystalpunk can interact with it: creating
patterns, signalling it and monitoring its output. But the rules that
guide its movement are mind boggling gargoyly. Can it Compute? Can it
loop forever? These and many other questions are to be explored during
this workshop.

The script we have made is a sloppy bit of Python code and in this
workshop we invite you to make things [fractalline patterns, logic
gates, literature, self-destructing embroidery forms] on top of it.

Please bring your computer if you have one.

The *new* version of the script, documentation and explanation can be
downloaded:
http://socialfiction.org/gargoyle.html

Download Python: http://www.python.org

…………………………………………………………………………………….

Public Space With A Roof
Is a non-profit, artist-run project space
located in the old Film Academy, OT301
Overtoom 301,
1054 HW Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Email: pswar@xs4all.nl

http://www.pswar.org

Marc Davis posted a photo:

No location tags for your photo? Click Update Location — you will also help ZoneTag learn this location for future photos (permission-based access).

ZoneTag has suggested tags for this photo: try it out! (owner access only)

Remember: ZoneTag has to be running before you take photos. How to run ZoneTag.